« Index

 

Yield Strategy Index

index

Yield Strategy Index ÔÇö Passive vs Active Income Methods in DeFi

This index categorizes yield strategies based on how much time, effort, and risk a user must take to earn consistent returns. It compares passive holding rewards to more active techniques like liquidity farming and manual compounding. Matching your strategy to your lifestyle and risk tolerance is key in DeFi.

Use Case: Helps DeFi users decide how hands-on or hands-off they want to be ÔÇö and what kind of tools or tokens match their goals.

Key Concepts:

  • Passive Yield
  • Active Farming
  • Manual Claiming
  • Auto-Compounding
  • APR vs APY

 
Strategy Effort Level Compounding Risk Level Platform Examples Notes
Holding $KAG / $KAU Very Low Yes (via HolderÔÇÖs Yield) Low Kinesis Real asset-based yield with no token farming
Staking Native Token Low No (manual restake) LowÔÇôModerate $ADA, $ETH, $HBAR, $FLR Simple to set up; restaking often required
Liquid Staking ($sFLR, $stETH) Low Yes (auto accrual) Low Sceptre, Lido DeFi composability + passive growth
Auto-Compounding Vault Medium Yes Moderate Beefy, Cyclo.Finance, SparkDEX Yield is maximized but can include platform risk
Manual Yield Farming High No (must harvest & reinvest) High Uniswap, BlazeSwap, Pangolin Subject to impermanent loss + token inflation
Lending/Borrowing Medium No Moderate Kinetic, Aave, Compound Stable income, but liquidation risk on borrowing
Referral Programs Very Low Yes (via bonus payouts) Low Kinesis, CEX platforms, DeFi protocols Passive but dependent on external adoption

 
« Index