« Index

 

DeFi Yield Models

DeFi Strategies • Yield Models • Token Income

structures for decentralized income generation

DeFi Yield Models define how decentralized finance protocols create and distribute income to participants. These models vary widely—ranging from liquidity mining and protocol fees to real-world revenue and rebasing mechanisms. Each model carries distinct risk profiles, sustainability timelines, and economic signals that affect user behavior, capital inflow, and protocol longevity. Understanding these yield models is crucial for assessing whether income is speculative, inflationary, utility-driven, or revenue-backed.

Use Case: An investor compares a high-APR farm that issues emissions from a reward pool with a staking pool that yields a share of protocol transaction fees. By understanding DeFi Yield Models, they can distinguish between speculative APR and sustainable income streams.

Key Concepts:

Summary: DeFi Yield Models reveal the true foundation of income in Web3. Whether driven by hype or grounded in utility, each structure informs risk, sustainability, and capital deployment. Mastery of these models helps users filter between short-term gains and long-term digital wealth systems.

Model Type Yield Source Sustainability Best Fit For
Value-Backed Yield Protocol Revenue High Long-Term Investors
Speculative Alpha Token Emissions Low Short-Term Yield Farmers
Real Yield Targeting On-Chain Usage Medium to High Sustainable DeFi Platforms
Emission Fallout Resilience Post-Emission Mechanisms Essential for Survival Protocols Exiting Reward Phase

DeFi Yield Model Categories

understanding where yield actually comes from

Revenue-Based Models
Trading Fees — DEX swap fees to LPs
Lending Interest — Borrower payments
Protocol Fees — Transaction cuts
Real-World RevenueKinesis transaction yield
Treasury Yield — T-bill backed stables
• Sustainable: Revenue must exist first
Emission-Based Models
Liquidity Mining — New tokens to LPs
Staking Rewards — Inflation distribution
Farming Incentives — Bootstrap rewards
Governance Airdrops — Token distribution
Referral Programs — Growth incentives
• Risk: Dilution without revenue backing
Hybrid Models
Fee + Emission — Revenue plus incentives
Buyback + Burn — Revenue reduces supply
veTokenomics — Lock for fee share
Protocol-Owned Liquidity — Self-sustaining
• Balance: Emissions bootstrap, fees sustain
Rebasing/Algorithmic Models
Elastic Supply — Token quantity adjusts
Algorithmic Stables — Mint/burn mechanics
Bonding Mechanisms — Discounted tokens
Seigniorage Shares — Multi-token systems
• Caution: High complexity, high risk
The Golden Rule: If yield doesn’t come from real economic activity (fees, revenue, interest), it comes from new token creation—which means dilution. Always ask: “Where does this yield actually come from?”

Yield Sustainability Spectrum

from speculative to perpetual

Tier Source Duration Example
Tier 1: Perpetual Real-world economic activity Indefinite Kinesis Holder’s Yield
Tier 2: Sustainable Protocol revenue (fees) As long as usage continues Uniswap LP fees, GMX
Tier 3: Hybrid Revenue + emissions Years (if balanced) Curve, Convex
Tier 4: Finite Emission schedule Until emissions end Most farming pools
Tier 5: Speculative New deposits (Ponzi risk) Until inflows stop Unsustainable high-APY
Portfolio Strategy: Build your foundation on Tier 1-2 yield models. Use Tier 3-4 for growth with awareness of timelines. Avoid Tier 5 entirely—or treat as pure speculation with capital you can lose.

Yield Source Analysis

decomposing where returns actually originate

Real Economic Activity
• Trading fees from swaps
• Interest from loans
• Transaction fees from usage
• Real-world revenue streams
• Treasury yield from holdings
Verdict: Sustainable
Token Inflation
• New tokens minted
• Emission schedules
• Liquidity mining rewards
• Staking inflation
• Governance distribution
Verdict: Dilutive without utility
New Deposits (Red Flag)
• Yield from new entrants
• Referral chain rewards
• “Sustainable” high APY
• No clear revenue source
• Musical chairs economics
Verdict: Ponzi characteristics
Questions to Ask
• Where does the yield come from?
• Who is paying for my returns?
• Would this work with no new users?
• What happens when emissions end?
• Is the APY sustainable at scale?
Green Flags
• Transparent fee revenue
• Audited treasury
• Declining but stable APY
• Real protocol usage
Physical asset backing
The Test: If a protocol’s TVL dropped 90% tomorrow, would yield still flow? Revenue-based models pass this test. Pure emission models fail. Kinesis passes—yield comes from transaction fees on physical metal movement, not token inflation.

Common DeFi Yield Models Explained

mechanics of popular income structures

LP Fee Sharing
• Provide liquidity to AMM pool
• Earn share of swap fees
• Proportional to liquidity share
• Revenue-based, sustainable
• Risk: Impermanent loss
• Example: Uniswap, SushiSwap
Staking Inflation
• Stake tokens to secure network
• Earn newly minted tokens
• Inflation rate varies
• Emission-based, dilutive
• Risk: Real yield may be negative
• Example: ETH staking (~4-5%)
Lending Interest
• Supply assets to lending pool
• Borrowers pay interest
• Variable rates based on demand
• Revenue-based, sustainable
• Risk: Smart contract, liquidation cascade
• Example: Aave, Compound
veTokenomics
• Lock tokens for voting power
• Earn protocol fee share
• Longer lock = more rewards
• Hybrid: fees + emissions
• Risk: Illiquidity during lock
• Example: Curve, Balancer
Real-World Asset Yield
• Tokenized physical assets
• Revenue from real economic activity
• Transaction fees, usage fees
• Perpetually sustainable
• Risk: Counterparty, custody
• Example: Kinesis ($KAG/$KAU)
Treasury-Backed Yield
• Stablecoins backed by T-bills
• Yield from government bonds
• Passed through to holders
• Revenue-based, sustainable
• Risk: Regulatory, rate changes
• Example: sFRAX, sDAI
Model Selection: Choose yield models based on your timeline and risk tolerance. Short-term: emission farming is viable with timing skills. Long-term: prioritize revenue-based models like LP fees, lending interest, and real-world asset yield.

Yield Model Risk Assessment

evaluating income structures for durability

Risk Factor Low Risk High Risk
Yield Source Protocol fees, real revenue Token emissions, new deposits
APY Level 5-20% (sustainable range) 100%+ (unsustainable)
Protocol Age 2+ years, battle-tested New, unproven
TVL Trend Stable or growing Declining rapidly
Audit Status Multiple reputable audits Unaudited or single audit
Emission Schedule Clear, declining, documented Unclear, admin-controlled
Due Diligence Framework: Before committing capital, assess each risk factor. A protocol scoring “High Risk” on multiple factors should be treated as speculation, not income infrastructure. Build your core on low-risk yield models.

Yield Model Portfolio Strategy

allocating across income structures

Foundation (50-60%)
• Real-world asset yield
$KAG/$KAU Holder’s Yield
• Treasury-backed stablecoin yield
• Battle-tested staking (ETH, etc.)
• Perpetually sustainable
• Low maintenance required
Growth (25-35%)
• LP fee sharing (major pairs)
• Lending interest (blue chips)
• veTokenomics participation
• Liquid staking derivatives
• Revenue-based, sustainable
• Moderate attention needed
Opportunity (10-15%)
• New protocol incentives
• Emission farming (timed)
• Airdrop farming
• Higher risk, higher potential
• Requires active management
• Exit before emissions end
Buffer (5-10%)
• Stablecoins (no yield focus)
• Rotation capital
• Opportunity reserve
• Cycle exit buffer
• Pure optionality
• Ready for reallocation
The 80/20 Principle: 80% of your yield portfolio should be in sustainable, revenue-based models (Foundation + Growth). The remaining 20% can pursue higher returns with higher risk. This ensures your income survives market cycles.

DeFi Yield Models Checklist

evaluating and selecting income structures

Model Evaluation
☐ Identify yield source clearly
☐ Determine sustainability tier
☐ Check emission schedule
☐ Assess protocol age and TVL
☐ Review audit status
☐ Calculate real yield (APY – inflation)
Risk Assessment
☐ Smart contract risk
☐ Impermanent loss exposure
☐ Token price risk
☐ Liquidity/exit risk
☐ Regulatory considerations
☐ Counterparty risk
Portfolio Integration
☐ Diversify across model types
☐ Balance risk/reward
☐ Layer by sustainability
☐ Plan entry and exit timing
☐ Monitor emission schedules
☐ Rebalance as needed
Security
☐ Use hardware wallet
Tangem for mobile access
Ledger for cold storage
☐ Verify contract addresses
☐ Start with small test amounts
☐ Document all positions
The Principle: Understanding DeFi Yield Models is the difference between building sustainable income and chasing unsustainable returns. Always trace yield to its source—if you can’t identify where the money comes from, you might be the source. Build on revenue, not emissions.

 
« Index