« Index

 

Time-Weighted Rewards

DeFi Strategies • Yield Models • Token Income

duration-based incentive scaling

Time-Weighted Rewards are incentive models that increase user earnings or privileges based on the length of time assets are staked, held, or committed within a platform. The longer a user maintains participation — without withdrawing or breaking the cycle — the greater the benefit they receive. These models are used to reduce token velocity, build loyalty, and promote long-term alignment between users and protocols.

Use Case: A staking vault distributes rewards using a time-weighted model where users earn 1× yield in the first 30 days, 1.5× after 60 days, and 2× after 90 days — so long as tokens remain uninterrupted in the vault. If withdrawn, the multiplier resets.

Key Concepts:

Summary: Time-Weighted Rewards strengthen protocol stability by rewarding users who stay committed over time. They convert passive holding into strategic engagement and support DeFi ecosystems by aligning reward systems with long-term value creation.

Duration Staked Reward Multiplier Access Benefit
0–30 days Base APY
31–60 days 1.25× Minor yield boost
61–90 days 1.5× Access to premium pools
91–180 days 1.75× Governance rights
180+ days 2×+ Max yield + revenue share

Linear Model
Rewards grow steadily
Example: +0.5% per week
Predictable progression
No big jumps
Simple and transparent
Tiered Model
Step increases at milestones
Example: 1× → 1.5× → 2×
Clear goals to reach
Motivation at thresholds
Most common implementation
Exponential Model
Rewards accelerate over time
Example: 1.1^(weeks)
Rewards long-term heavily
Complex calculations
Maximum loyalty incentive
Model Trade-offs: Linear is simplest but may not motivate. Tiered creates clear goals but can feel like jumps. Exponential rewards commitment most but is harder to understand.

Component How It Works User Impact
Base Rate Starting APR for all users Entry-level yield
Time Counter Tracks continuous stake duration Progress toward multipliers
Multiplier Curve Formula determining boost per time Rate of reward increase
Reset Trigger Actions that reset the counter Defines what breaks progress
Cap/Maximum Upper limit on multiplier Maximum achievable benefit

Flat Rewards
– Same APR for everyone
– No duration advantage
– Equal treatment
– Easy to game
– Attracts mercenary capital
– High churn
Time-Weighted Rewards
– APR grows with duration
– Loyalty rewarded
– Differentiated treatment
– Gaming-resistant
– Attracts committed users
– Lower churn
Economic Reality: Flat rewards attract capital that leaves when rates drop. Time-weighted rewards attract capital that stays through cycles — dramatically different protocol outcomes.

Why It Works
– Sunk time investment
– Progress visualization
– Loss aversion (multiplier)
– Goal completion desire
– Future reward anticipation
– Status differentiation
When It Backfires
– Progress feels too slow
– Maximum too hard to reach
– Better opportunities elsewhere
– Protocol health declines
– Rules change mid-stake
– Multiplier feels trivial
Design Balance: Users should feel “I’m making meaningful progress” not “this will take forever.” The path to maximum multiplier should feel achievable, not discouraging.

Example: 90-Day Staker
Principal: $10,000
Base APR: 10%
Time-weighted multiplier: 1.5×
Effective APR: 15%
90-day yield: ~$375
vs ~$250 at base rate
Example: Early Exit (Day 45)
Principal: $10,000
Base APR earned: 10%
45-day yield: ~$125
Multiplier reset: back to 1×
Lost opportunity: higher APR
Restart from Day 0
Compounding Effect: Time-weighted rewards compound psychologically — the longer you stay, the more you have to lose by leaving. At 90 days, you’re not just losing current yield but future 2× multiplier access.

Maximizing Time-Weighted Rewards
– Stake early, stay long
– Track multiplier milestones
– Don’t break for small gains
– Plan exits around tier thresholds
– Factor future multiplier value
– Consider partial stakes if allowed
When to Accept Reset
– Opportunity value exceeds future multiplier
– Protocol shows decline signs
– Better risk-adjusted alternatives
– Personal liquidity needs
– Nearing cycle end anyway
– Multiplier growth has capped
Exit Math: Calculate: (Days to next tier × opportunity cost) vs (Value of reaching next tier). If opportunity cost exceeds tier value, exiting makes sense. If not, patience pays.

 
« Index