« Index

 

Throughput

Sovereign Assets • Layer 1s • Payment Networks

transaction processing capacity

Throughput refers to the number of transactions, operations, or data packets a blockchain network, protocol, or application can process within a specific time frame—typically measured in transactions per second (TPS). High throughput is essential for scalability, as it determines how many users and applications a network can support without congestion, delays, or high fees. Throughput is affected by block size, block time, consensus mechanism, and the implementation of scaling solutions like Layer 2 protocols and rollups.

Use Case: Ethereum’s native throughput is limited to around 15 TPS, but Layer 2 solutions like Arbitrum or Optimism increase effective throughput to thousands of TPS, enabling high-volume DeFi and gaming apps to operate smoothly.

Key Concepts:

  • Layer One Protocol — The base chain whose design sets foundational throughput limits
  • Layer Two Protocol — Scaling networks that boost throughput by processing transactions off-chain
  • Rollups — Bundle many transactions, dramatically increasing TPS while leveraging Layer 1 security
  • Sidechains — Independent networks that add parallel throughput to main chains
  • Settlement Finality — The point at which increased throughput still guarantees irreversible transaction completion
  • Scalability — The broader goal that throughput optimization serves
  • Consensus Mechanism — Protocol design that fundamentally determines TPS limits
  • Gas Price — Cost indicator that rises when throughput is exceeded

Summary: Throughput measures a network’s capacity for handling activity at scale. High throughput is vital for global adoption of blockchain applications, reducing congestion, and lowering transaction costs as Web3 grows.

Network Native Throughput (TPS) With Scaling Solutions
Ethereum ~15 TPS 2,000+ TPS (Arbitrum, Optimism)
Bitcoin ~7 TPS 1,000+ TPS (Lightning Network)
Solana 2,000+ TPS (native) N/A (already high)
XRP Ledger 1,500 TPS N/A (no Layer 2 yet)

Network Throughput Comparison

TPS across major blockchain ecosystems

Network TPS Finality Trade-Off
Bitcoin ~7 ~60 min (6 blocks) Security over speed
Ethereum ~15 ~15 min Decentralization priority
Flare ~1,000 ~2-3 sec Balanced approach
Solana ~2,000+ ~400 ms Speed over decentralization
XRP Ledger ~1,500 ~3-5 sec Payment optimization
Visa (Reference) ~24,000 Instant (centralized) Full centralization

Throughput Factors Framework

what determines transaction capacity

Block Parameters

Block Size: Larger = more txs
Block Time: Faster = more TPS
Gas Limit: Higher = more compute

Trade-off: Bigger blocks require more resources to validate

Consensus Design

PoW: Slow, secure (~7-15 TPS)
PoS: Faster (~100-1000 TPS)
DPoS: Very fast (~1000+ TPS)

Trade-off: Speed often sacrifices decentralization

Scaling Solutions

L2 Rollups: Batch off-chain
Sidechains: Parallel processing
Sharding: Split workload

Trade-off: Complexity, bridging risks

Throughput Evaluation Checklist

choosing networks for your use case

Use Case Matching

☐ High-frequency trading → High TPS needed
☐ Store of value → TPS less critical
☐ Gaming/NFTs → Moderate-high TPS
☐ DeFi swaps → Depends on volume
☐ Payments → Fast finality priority
☐ Enterprise → Predictable throughput

Network Assessment

☐ Claimed TPS vs. actual sustained TPS
☐ Performance during congestion spikes
☐ Historical uptime record
☐ Finality time acceptable for use
☐ Fee behavior when throughput maxed
☐ Scaling roadmap credibility

High-Throughput Options

SparkDEX — Flare ecosystem
Cyclo — liquid staking, fast
☐ XRPL for payment rails
☐ Solana for trading volume
☐ L2s for ETH-based apps
☐ Match chain to activity type

Portfolio Considerations

☐ Diversify across throughput profiles
Ledger for secure storage layer
$KAG/$KAU — off-chain, no TPS limits
☐ Don’t sacrifice security for speed
☐ Consider congestion during bull runs
☐ Test exit paths before committing

Capital Rotation Map (Crypto Cycle Flow)

throughput demands across rotation phases

BTC
Phase 1
Low TPS Sufficient
ETH
Phase 2
L2s Activate
Large Alts
Phase 3
Multi-Chain Spread
Small Alts
Phase 4
Congestion Begins
Memes/NFTs
Phase 5
Networks Saturate
Preservation
Phase 6
Activity Collapses
Throughput Cycle: Network demands follow rotation phases. Phase 1-2: BTC and ETH handle moderate load — L2s provide overflow. Phase 3-4: Activity spreads across high-throughput chains — Solana, XRPL, Flare absorb DeFi volume. Phase 5: Peak chaos — even high-TPS networks struggle during meme launches and NFT mints. Failed transactions, stuck queues, gas wars. Phase 6: Throughput becomes irrelevant as activity collapses. The lesson: don’t rely on any single network’s capacity during euphoria phases. Spread across chains, use L2s, and keep core holdings in $KAG/$KAU where physical settlement means infinite throughput — metal moves regardless of block times.

 
« Index