Staking System Overview
Governance Layer • Validators • Protocol Control
comprehensive guide to staking models and mechanics
Staking System Overview — Yield Models & Delegation Mechanics
Staking is the foundation of many blockchain networks — used to secure consensus, validate transactions, and reward token holders. But staking is no longer a single model. This overview breaks down the four primary forms of staking systems used across protocols today: traditional staking, delegated staking, liquid staking, and restaking.
Use Case: Provides a framework for understanding how staking earns rewards, how it’s evolving, and which methods maintain liquidity, decentralization, or protocol control.
Key Concepts:
- Validator Sets — Groups of authorized nodes that validate transactions and secure the network
- Lock-Up Periods — Time duration assets must remain staked before withdrawal is allowed
- Delegation — Process of assigning stake to a validator without transferring custody
- Liquid Yield — Earning rewards while maintaining asset liquidity through derivative tokens
- Restaking Protocols — Systems that allow already-staked assets to secure additional networks
- Security Guarantees — Assurances provided by stake-backed consensus mechanisms
- Staking — Locking tokens to participate in network validation and earn rewards
- Proof of Stake — Consensus mechanism underlying most staking systems
- Validator Node — Network participant that produces blocks and earns rewards
- Delegated Validator — Elected node receiving delegated stake from users
- Liquid Staking Protocol — Services providing tradeable staked token derivatives
- Delegated Proof of Stake — Consensus model where users delegate to validators
- APY – Annual Percentage Yield — Annualized return rate including compounding
Core Staking Models:
- 1. Traditional Staking
- User locks their tokens directly into the network (e.g., $ETH, $ADA)
- Assets are illiquid during the staking period
- Rewards are distributed based on uptime and validator performance
- 2. Delegated Staking
- User assigns their stake to a third-party validator without giving up custody
- Popular in networks like $XRP (UNL model), $FLR (FTSO), and $ATOM
- Validators earn commission, and users earn passive yield
- 3. Liquid Staking
- User stakes tokens and receives a liquid “receipt” token (e.g., $sFLR, $stETH)
- Token can be used in DeFi (lending, farming, etc.) while earning staking rewards
- Popularized by Lido, Rocket Pool, and Sceptre Protocol
- 4. Restaking
- User takes already staked assets and reuses them to secure additional networks or services
- Enables multi-use security and layered yield (e.g., EigenLayer on Ethereum)
- Still experimental — raises questions around slashing and composability risk
Why Staking Systems Matter:
- Defines how networks stay secure and decentralized
- Shapes user incentives, liquidity availability, and validator power dynamics
- Influences how DeFi protocols are built on top of underlying infrastructure
Summary: Staking has evolved from simple token lock-ups to a diverse ecosystem of yield-generating mechanisms. Understanding the differences between traditional, delegated, liquid, and restaking models helps users optimize returns while managing risk, liquidity, and exposure across multiple protocols.
Staking Model Deep Dive
detailed comparison of four primary models
• Direct network participation
• Full lockup required
• Native rewards only
• Examples: Solo ETH, ADA pools
• Best for: Long-term holders
• Trade-off: No liquidity access
• Stake through validators
• No technical setup needed
• Commission to validator (5-20%)
• Examples: Cosmos, Flare FTSO
• Best for: Passive participants
• Trade-off: Validator dependency
• Receive tradeable derivative
• Use in DeFi while staking
• “Double-dip” yield potential
• Examples: Lido, Sceptre, Rocket Pool
• Best for: Active DeFi users
• Trade-off: Smart contract risk
• Reuse staked assets
• Secure multiple networks
• Layered yield stacking
• Examples: EigenLayer, Symbiotic
• Best for: Yield maximizers
• Trade-off: Compounded slashing risk
Staking by Network
how major protocols implement staking
Liquid Staking Ecosystem
major providers and their derivatives
• stETH (Lido) — Largest, rebase model
• rETH (Rocket Pool) — Decentralized
• cbETH (Coinbase) — Institutional
• frxETH (Frax) — Dual token model
• swETH (Swell) — Restaking ready
• Market share: ~35% of staked ETH
• sFLR (Sceptre) — Flare ecosystem
• mSOL (Marinade) — Solana
• sAVAX (Benqi) — Avalanche
• stATOM (Stride) — Cosmos
• stDOT (various) — Polkadot
• Growing cross-chain coverage
• Provide LP (stETH/ETH pairs)
• Collateral for borrowing
• Yield farming on Curve/Convex
• Restaking via EigenLayer
• Leveraged staking loops
• Cross-chain bridging
• Smart contract vulnerabilities
• Depeg risk (stETH 2022)
• Slashing passed to holders
• Centralization (Lido dominance)
• Composability failures
• Withdrawal queue delays
Restaking Explained
the frontier of staking innovation
1. User stakes ETH (or LST like stETH) with restaking protocol
2. Protocol uses that stake as collateral for additional services
3. Services (AVSs) pay fees for the security they receive
4. User earns base staking yield + restaking rewards
5. Slashing risk compounds across all secured services
• Higher total yield
• Capital efficiency
• Bootstrap security for new protocols
• Shared security model
• Composable staking
• New yield sources
• Compounded slashing exposure
• Smart contract complexity
• Untested at scale
• Correlation risk
• Operator failures
• Regulatory uncertainty
Staking System Checklist
navigating staking options effectively
☐ Evaluate smart contract risk
☐ Check validator/protocol reputation
☐ Understand slashing conditions
☐ Know depeg risks (LSTs)
☐ Assess compounding risks (restaking)
☐ Diversify across models
☐ Compare APY across options
☐ Factor in commission/fees
☐ Consider DeFi composability
☐ Track reward claiming
☐ Evaluate yield sources (inflation vs revenue)
☐ Include real-yield assets