SAFT Agreement
Governance Layer • Legal Frameworks • Token Distribution
pre-launch investment contract for future token delivery
SAFT Agreement — Simple Agreement for Future Tokens — is a legal contract between a blockchain project and an accredited investor that grants the investor the right to receive tokens at a future date, typically upon network launch or a triggering event. It was designed as a compliant fundraising mechanism that allows projects to raise capital before their token exists or their network is live — without selling an unregistered security on the open market. The SAFT framework was created to navigate the tension between crypto fundraising and U.S. securities law. The logic is that the SAFT itself is a security — sold only to accredited investors under Regulation D — but the tokens delivered later are intended to function as utility tokens, not securities, once the network is operational. Whether that legal theory holds has been tested, debated, and challenged by regulators, but the framework remains one of the most widely used pre-launch fundraising instruments in the industry. For retail investors, SAFT agreements matter because they represent locked supply that will eventually enter circulation. Every SAFT token has a vesting schedule. Every vesting schedule has an unlock date. And every unlock date is potential sell pressure from investors who entered at a fraction of the current market price. Understanding who holds SAFT allocations, at what price they entered, and when their tokens unlock is essential due diligence — because SAFT investors are not long-term holders by default. They are early-stage capital seeking liquidity events. The gap between SAFT entry price and current market price is the gap between their profit and your risk.
Use Case: A Layer 1 project raises $30 million through SAFT agreements with venture funds at $0.02 per token before mainnet launch. Two years later, the token trades at $0.80. The SAFT vesting cliff expires and 1.5 billion tokens unlock over six months — creating sustained sell pressure that retail buyers who never checked the vesting schedule absorb at a loss while early investors exit at 40x.
Key Concepts:
- Token Unlock Structures — Vesting schedules that govern when SAFT tokens enter circulation
- Cliff Vesting — Initial lock period before any SAFT tokens are released
- Linear Vesting — Gradual token release after the cliff expires
- Backloaded Vesting — Vesting that delays the largest unlocks to later periods
- Token Vesting Models — The design frameworks governing SAFT distribution timing
- Investor Tranches — Tiered allocation structures separating early from late investors
- Tokenomics — The economic architecture that SAFT allocations sit within
- Tokenomics Audit Checklist — Evaluation framework that flags SAFT-related dilution risk
- Circulating Supply — The metric most directly impacted by SAFT unlock events
- Token Devaluation — Price erosion when SAFT supply floods the market
- Institutional Traders — The entities most commonly holding SAFT positions
- Derivatives — Instruments used to hedge SAFT positions before unlock
Summary: SAFT agreements are the invisible supply events that most retail investors never see coming. They fund the projects that build the networks — but they also create the vesting cliffs, unlock floods, and early-investor exits that reshape price action months after the hype cycle fades. Knowing where the SAFT supply sits is knowing where the sell pressure lives.
SAFT vs Other Fundraising Models Reference
comparing pre-launch capital instruments
Fundraising Truth: SAFT agreements fund innovation — but they also concentrate supply in the hands of investors whose only obligation is to their own return timeline. ICOs spread risk across retail. Fair launches eliminate insider advantage entirely. The fundraising model a project chooses tells you who will hold the most supply and when they will likely sell it. Read the cap table before you read the whitepaper.
SAFT Risk Assessment Framework
evaluating how pre-launch investment structures affect your position
What did SAFT investors pay per token? What is the current market price? If the gap is 20x or more, every SAFT holder is sitting on life-changing profit with zero emotional attachment to the project. They will sell. The question is not if — it is when. Calculate the gap before you buy. If you are the exit liquidity for a venture fund, the chart will show you too late.
Every SAFT has a vesting schedule. Map every unlock date on your calendar. Cross-reference with cycle phase timing. If a major unlock lands during Phase 4-5 peak distribution, the sell pressure compounds with broader market rotation. If it lands during Phase 1-2 accumulation, the market may absorb it. Timing is not optional — it is the difference between buying a dip and catching a flood.
Does the project publish its full tokenomics breakdown including SAFT allocations? Are investor wallets trackable on-chain? Can you verify how much of the SAFT allocation has already been sold versus held? Projects that hide their cap table are hiding the sell pressure. Transparency is the minimum standard. If you cannot find the SAFT details, assume the worst.
If you hold a token with upcoming SAFT unlocks, your preservation strategy must account for the dilution. Size positions knowing that supply is expanding. Set exit triggers before unlock dates — not after. Route profits into $KAG/$KAU where supply is physical and no venture fund holds a vesting schedule over your purchasing power. Secure in Ledger.
SAFT Due Diligence Checklist
☐ Is the SAFT allocation percentage publicly disclosed?
☐ Are SAFT investor wallet addresses identifiable on-chain?
☐ Is the entry price per token documented?
☐ Does the project publish a complete token distribution chart?
☐ Are advisor and team allocations separated from SAFT?
☐ Hidden allocations are hidden sell pressure
☐ What is the cliff duration before first unlock?
☐ Is vesting linear, backloaded, or milestone-based?
☐ How many months does the full vesting schedule span?
☐ Are there acceleration clauses that trigger early release?
☐ Have any vesting terms been renegotiated post-launch?
☐ The vesting schedule is the sell calendar — read every line
☐ What multiple is the current price over SAFT entry price?
☐ How much SAFT supply unlocks in the next 90 days?
☐ Is daily trading volume large enough to absorb unlock volume?
☐ Have previous unlock events caused visible price drops?
☐ Are SAFT holders staking or immediately selling post-unlock?
☐ The bigger the profit, the faster the exit
☐ Is my entry timed after the largest unlock events?
☐ Is my position sized for potential dilution impact?
☐ Do I have exit triggers set before the next unlock date?
☐ Are profits being routed to $KAG/$KAU ahead of supply events?
☐ Is core capital secured in Ledger independent of SAFT exposure?
☐ Position around the unlock — never through it blindly
Capital Rotation Map
SAFT supply dynamics across cycle phases