Exit Friction Models
Ownership • Legacy • Access Control • Sovereignty
mechanisms that slow, penalize, or disincentivize early withdrawal
Exit Friction Models are protocol-layer mechanisms designed to slow down or penalize capital withdrawal in order to reduce volatility, preserve liquidity, and promote long-term participation. These models create “soft locks” through timing constraints, fee structures, or progressive reward systems that make it economically irrational to exit early. Exit friction isn’t about restriction — it’s about realigning user behavior through well-placed disincentives and pacing.
Use Case: A staking platform includes a Cooldown Period of 7 days before assets can be withdrawn and applies a Protocol Withdrawal Fee if users exit before 30 days. Together, these exit friction models deter yield-hopping and preserve protocol stability.
Key Concepts:
- Cooldown Periods — Time delays that slow down unstaking or access to liquidity
- Protocol Withdrawal Fees — Penalty fees applied to early exits or fast capital movement
- Reset Penalty Systems — Users who leave lose all accrued loyalty or reward progress
- Retention Pressure — Incentive pacing that encourages users to remain staked longer
- Exit Discipline Toolkit — Modules that enforce behavioral alignment during withdrawals
- Penalty for Unstaking — Early exit consequence mechanisms
- Cooldown Penalties — Forfeiture or reductions during waiting periods
- Reward Forfeiture Models — Systems that revoke unearned rewards on exit
- Staking Disincentives — Mechanisms that discourage early withdrawal
- Behavioral Deterrent — Mechanisms that discourage short-term behavior
- Behavioral Lock-In — Users maintain benefits only through uninterrupted participation
- Protocol Stickiness — Ability to retain users through incentive design
- Token Velocity Control — Strategies to slow token turnover
- Unstaking Timers — Time-based delay between exit request and withdrawal
- Staking Withdrawal Mechanics — Framework governing how exits are paced and penalized
- Liquidity Defense Bundle — Combined mechanisms for TVL protection
Summary: Exit Friction Models introduce calculated resistance to withdrawal. By making exit behavior less attractive, they stabilize token ecosystems, reduce mercenary cycling, and increase the quality and consistency of protocol participants.
– Cooldown periods
– Unstaking timers
– Withdrawal queues
– Unbonding delays
– Notice periods
Makes leaving take time
– Withdrawal fees
– Exit penalties
– Reward forfeiture
– Principal slashing
– Gas cost penalties
Makes leaving cost money
– Multiplier resets
– Tier demotions
– Streak breaks
– Access revocation
– Status loss
Makes leaving cost progress
– 1-3 day cooldown
– 0.5-1% fee
– Minor multiplier loss
– Quick recovery
Filters casual farmers
– 7-14 day cooldown
– 1-2% fee
– Full multiplier reset
– Reward forfeiture
Industry standard
– 21+ day cooldown
– 3-5%+ fee
– Complete progress wipe
– Re-entry blacklist
High-value vaults only
– Creates reflection period
– Calculable exit cost
– Loss aversion psychology
– Filters uncommitted capital
– Stabilizes TVL
– Protects loyal users’ yield
– Friction feels arbitrary
– Rules hidden or unclear
– Emergency exits punished
– Competitors offer less friction
– Users feel trapped
– No decay over time
– What’s the cooldown period?
– Are there withdrawal fees?
– What resets on exit?
– When does friction reach 0?
– Are rules clearly documented?
– Can you commit to the terms?
– Wait for cooldown milestones
– Plan around fee decay
– Claim rewards before exit
– Factor total exit cost
– Compare to opportunity cost
– Time exits strategically