« Index

 

Distribution Models

Governance Layer • Validators • Protocol Control

token allocation strategy

Distribution Models define how tokens are initially and continuously allocated across various stakeholders in a blockchain ecosystem. This includes allocations to the founding team, early investors, community rewards, public sales, liquidity incentives, and treasury reserves. A balanced distribution model promotes decentralization, aligns incentives, and avoids centralization risks or sudden supply shocks.

Use Case: A protocol launches with a distribution model allocating 10% of tokens to the team (with a 2-year vesting lock), 15% to strategic investors, 50% to community rewards and liquidity mining, and 25% to the treasury and DAO governance. This ensures that active participants gain the majority share over time while maintaining reserves for development and sustainability.

Key Concepts:

  • Team Allocation — Reserved tokens for founders and core contributors, often time-locked
  • Community Rewards — Mining, staking, airdrops, or gamified incentives for active users
  • Investor Tranches — Pre-sale or seed round allocations with vesting terms
  • Treasury & DAO — Funds controlled by governance for future development or ecosystem growth
  • Tokenomics — Economic design governing token supply, demand, and distribution
  • Token Supply Models — Frameworks for managing total token issuance
  • Supply Structure — Predefined rules governing token creation and distribution
  • Token Unlock Structures — Scheduled release of locked token allocations
  • Token Vesting Models — Framework for structured token release
  • Cliff Vesting — Tokens locked until a specific date, then released
  • Linear Vesting — Tokens released steadily over a defined period
  • DAO — Decentralized autonomous organization using token-based governance
  • Governance Token — Token granting voting power over protocol decisions
  • Voting Power — Influence weight in governance based on token holdings
  • Minting — Process of creating new tokens on a blockchain

Summary: Distribution Models are crucial for long-term trust and stability. They determine who benefits from token growth, how control is shared, and whether a network truly empowers its users or concentrates power in early hands. Clear, transparent models foster credibility, decentralization, and healthy token velocity.

Category Fair Launch Model VC-Heavy Model
Initial Allocation Majority to community & users Majority to investors & insiders
Vesting Structure Often minimal or progressive Structured long-term lockups
Governance Impact User-led DAOs from start Investor control dominates early
Market Trust High due to transparency Mixed due to concentration risks
Funding Source Community sales, bootstrapped Venture capital, private rounds

Allocation Category Healthy Range Red Flag Range Purpose
Team/Founders 10-20% >25% Incentivize builders
Investors (Seed/Private) 10-20% >30% Fund development
Community/Ecosystem 30-50% <20% Drive adoption
Treasury/DAO 10-25% >40% (centralized) Future development
Public Sale 5-15% 0% (no access) Broad distribution
Advisors 2-5% >10% Strategic guidance

Fair Launch Model
– No pre-mine or insider allocation
– 100% distributed via mining/staking
– Community-first from day one
– High decentralization from start
– Examples: Bitcoin, early DeFi
– Risk: Limited development funding
VC-Funded Model
– Significant investor allocation
– Structured vesting schedules
– Professional treasury management
– Well-funded development
– Examples: Most Layer 1s, major DeFi
– Risk: Centralized early governance
Hybrid Model
– Balanced allocation across groups
– Community majority over time
– Vested team and investor tokens
– Treasury for ongoing development
– Examples: Modern protocols
– Risk: Complexity in coordination
Asset-Backed Model
– No arbitrary token distribution
– Supply = collateral deposited
$KAU/$KAG minted on demand
– No team/investor pre-allocation
– Examples: PAXG, Kinesis
– Risk: Dependent on asset custody
Spectrum: Fair launch = maximum decentralization but limited funding. VC-heavy = well-funded but centralized. Asset-backed = supply tied to real value, no arbitrary allocation.

Red Flags
– Team allocation >25%
– No vesting for insiders
– Hidden or undisclosed wallets
– Community allocation <20%
– Large “reserve” with no clarity
– Single entity controls treasury
Green Flags
– Community allocation >40%
– 4-year vesting for team
– Transparent allocation docs
– DAO-controlled treasury
– Public sale accessibility
– On-chain verifiable distribution
Rule: If insiders hold more than the community, the project serves insiders. True decentralization requires community majority.

Phase Typical Distribution Activity Governance Shift
Launch Public sale, initial airdrops, liquidity bootstrap Team/investors dominant
Year 1 Community rewards, staking incentives, grants Community gaining share
Year 2-3 Ecosystem growth, DAO distributions, partnerships Balance shifting to users
Maturity Ongoing rewards, buybacks, treasury deployment Community majority achieved

Before Investing — Check
– What % goes to team/investors?
– What % goes to community?
– Are vesting schedules enforced?
– Who controls the treasury?
– Is allocation on-chain verifiable?
– When do major unlocks occur?
Ongoing Monitoring
– Are team wallets selling?
– Is community share growing?
– How is treasury being used?
– Are governance votes legitimate?
– Is distribution matching docs?
– Any changes to allocation terms?
Principle: Distribution determines destiny. Who holds the tokens determines who controls the protocol. Always verify before trusting.

 
« Index