Distribution Models
Governance Layer • Validators • Protocol Control
token allocation strategy
Distribution Models define how tokens are initially and continuously allocated across various stakeholders in a blockchain ecosystem. This includes allocations to the founding team, early investors, community rewards, public sales, liquidity incentives, and treasury reserves. A balanced distribution model promotes decentralization, aligns incentives, and avoids centralization risks or sudden supply shocks.
Use Case: A protocol launches with a distribution model allocating 10% of tokens to the team (with a 2-year vesting lock), 15% to strategic investors, 50% to community rewards and liquidity mining, and 25% to the treasury and DAO governance. This ensures that active participants gain the majority share over time while maintaining reserves for development and sustainability.
Key Concepts:
- Team Allocation — Reserved tokens for founders and core contributors, often time-locked
- Community Rewards — Mining, staking, airdrops, or gamified incentives for active users
- Investor Tranches — Pre-sale or seed round allocations with vesting terms
- Treasury & DAO — Funds controlled by governance for future development or ecosystem growth
- Tokenomics — Economic design governing token supply, demand, and distribution
- Token Supply Models — Frameworks for managing total token issuance
- Supply Structure — Predefined rules governing token creation and distribution
- Token Unlock Structures — Scheduled release of locked token allocations
- Token Vesting Models — Framework for structured token release
- Cliff Vesting — Tokens locked until a specific date, then released
- Linear Vesting — Tokens released steadily over a defined period
- DAO — Decentralized autonomous organization using token-based governance
- Governance Token — Token granting voting power over protocol decisions
- Voting Power — Influence weight in governance based on token holdings
- Minting — Process of creating new tokens on a blockchain
Summary: Distribution Models are crucial for long-term trust and stability. They determine who benefits from token growth, how control is shared, and whether a network truly empowers its users or concentrates power in early hands. Clear, transparent models foster credibility, decentralization, and healthy token velocity.
– No pre-mine or insider allocation
– 100% distributed via mining/staking
– Community-first from day one
– High decentralization from start
– Examples: Bitcoin, early DeFi
– Risk: Limited development funding
– Significant investor allocation
– Structured vesting schedules
– Professional treasury management
– Well-funded development
– Examples: Most Layer 1s, major DeFi
– Risk: Centralized early governance
– Balanced allocation across groups
– Community majority over time
– Vested team and investor tokens
– Treasury for ongoing development
– Examples: Modern protocols
– Risk: Complexity in coordination
– No arbitrary token distribution
– Supply = collateral deposited
– $KAU/$KAG minted on demand
– No team/investor pre-allocation
– Examples: PAXG, Kinesis
– Risk: Dependent on asset custody
– Team allocation >25%
– No vesting for insiders
– Hidden or undisclosed wallets
– Community allocation <20%
– Large “reserve” with no clarity
– Single entity controls treasury
– Community allocation >40%
– 4-year vesting for team
– Transparent allocation docs
– DAO-controlled treasury
– Public sale accessibility
– On-chain verifiable distribution
– What % goes to team/investors?
– What % goes to community?
– Are vesting schedules enforced?
– Who controls the treasury?
– Is allocation on-chain verifiable?
– When do major unlocks occur?
– Are team wallets selling?
– Is community share growing?
– How is treasury being used?
– Are governance votes legitimate?
– Is distribution matching docs?
– Any changes to allocation terms?